In a noteworthy development at the Federal High Court in Abuja, Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader Nnamdi Kanu failed to open his defence as ordered by the court. Kanu cited the denial of access to crucial case files as the main reason for his inability to present his defence.
Kanu’s legal team informed the court that despite repeated requests, they have been denied access to the prosecution’s case file, which is vital for the preparation and presentation of an effective defence. This denial, they argue, violates his right to a fair trial and hampers the judicial process.
The court had earlier directed Kanu to begin his defence after concluding the prosecution’s case in the terrorism charges against him. However, the IPOB leader’s refusal to proceed without the case files has added another layer of complexity to the already tense trial.
The judge panel acknowledged the submission but insisted on the importance of adhering to the court's directives while considering motions and complaints within the legal framework.
This development underscores the legal and political challenges surrounding Nnamdi Kanu’s high-profile case, which has attracted significant attention both locally and internationally for its implications on Nigeria’s political and security landscape.
Observers note that access to case files is a fundamental component of justice, and its denial raises concerns about transparency and fairness in the trial proceedings. Meanwhile, Kanu’s supporters remain vigilant, calling for impartiality and rule of law in the ongoing legal battle.
The trial’s progress will be closely watched in coming weeks, as the court balances procedural fairness with judicial timelines in this landmark case .